[19980128]97-39EPW_权利辩论.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:14547 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:1998-01-28 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:38.87KB
下载 相关 举报
[19980128]97-39EPW_权利辩论.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[19980128]97-39EPW_权利辩论.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[19980128]97-39EPW_权利辩论.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[19980128]97-39EPW_权利辩论.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[19980128]97-39EPW_权利辩论.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS Web97-39 EPWUpdated January 28, 1998The Entitlements DebateDavid Stuart KoitzSpecialist in Social LegislationEducation and Public Welfare DivisionSummaryFederal entitlement programs make payments di

2、rectly to recipients who meeteligibility criteria set by law. There are about 400 of them with Social Security beingthe largest. Generally, entitlement spending is not subject to control through annualappropriations, and once an entitlement program is established, its scope can be alteredonly by ame

3、nding the law that created it. Over the past 25 years, entitlement spendinghas risen much faster than the federal budget and the gross domestic product (GDP).Proponents of curbing entitlements believe it is the key to controlling federal spendingin the long run. Left unchecked, they fear, entitlemen

4、t spending will place a large strainon federal budgets far into the future, limiting policy options and forcing futuregenerations to bear an enormous tax burden, especially when post-World War II babyboomers retire and draw on these programs. They put heavy emphasis on projectionsmade by the Social

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告