[20040719]RS21888_修改对抗条款:克劳福德诉华盛顿.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:17496 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2004-07-19 格式:PDF 页数:7 大小:53.32KB
下载 相关 举报
[20040719]RS21888_修改对抗条款:克劳福德诉华盛顿.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
[20040719]RS21888_修改对抗条款:克劳福德诉华盛顿.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
[20040719]RS21888_修改对抗条款:克劳福德诉华盛顿.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
[20040719]RS21888_修改对抗条款:克劳福德诉华盛顿.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
[20040719]RS21888_修改对抗条款:克劳福德诉华盛顿.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、1 U.S. CONSTITUTION, Amendment VI.2 124 S.Ct 1354 (2004).3 Hearsay is “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or(continued.)Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS21888July 19, 200

2、4Confrontation Clause Reshaped: Crawford v. Washingtonname redactedLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryIn Crawford v. Washington, 124 S.Ct. 1354 (2004), the United States SupremeCourt held that to admit hearsay testimonial evidence in criminal prosecutions the SixthAmendment, the Confron

3、tation Clause, requires that (1) the witness be unavailable and(2) the accused had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness. This decisionoverruled Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 (1980), where the Supreme Court had advanceda test requiring only that the statement from unavailable witnesses fal

4、l within a “firmlyrooted hearsay exception” or bore “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness” in orderto be admissible. In Crawford, the Court conducted an historical analysis of theConfrontation Clause concluding that a prior opportunity to cross-examine was anecessary condition for testimonia

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告