[20050719]RS22191_平权行动:奥康纳法官的意见.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:18278 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2005-07-19 格式:PDF 页数:7 大小:54.57KB
下载 相关 举报
[20050719]RS22191_平权行动:奥康纳法官的意见.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
[20050719]RS22191_平权行动:奥康纳法官的意见.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
[20050719]RS22191_平权行动:奥康纳法官的意见.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
[20050719]RS22191_平权行动:奥康纳法官的意见.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
[20050719]RS22191_平权行动:奥康纳法官的意见.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、1 United Steelworkers v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (1979). 2 Local 28 Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC, 478 U.S. 421 (1986).3 United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149 (1987); Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S.(continued.)Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceiv

2、ed through the CRS WebOrder Code RS22191Updated July 19, 2005Affirmative Action: Justice OConnorsOpinionsname redactedLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryAn examination of Justice OConnors opinions reveals a gradual shift inperspective regarding the legal and constitutional standards to

3、be applied in evaluatinggovernmental affirmative action efforts, and the manner of their application in variouslegal and factual settings. This report briefly surveys decisions of retiring Justice SandraDay OConnor in affirmative action cases, an area where her opinions have frequentlydetermined the

4、 outcome.An examination of Justice OConnors opinions reveals a gradual shift inperspective regarding the legal and constitutional standards to be applied in evaluatinggovernmental affirmative action efforts, and the manner of their application in variouslegal and factual settings. Early on, Justice

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告