[20050720]RS22201_教会和国家法律:奥康纳法官精选意见.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:18286 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2005-07-20 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:40.34KB
下载 相关 举报
[20050720]RS22201_教会和国家法律:奥康纳法官精选意见.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[20050720]RS22201_教会和国家法律:奥康纳法官精选意见.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[20050720]RS22201_教会和国家法律:奥康纳法官精选意见.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[20050720]RS22201_教会和国家法律:奥康纳法官精选意见.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[20050720]RS22201_教会和国家法律:奥康纳法官精选意见.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、1 Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, 512 U.S. 687, 720 (1994).2 Id at 720.3 Id. at 718.4 Justice OConnor wrote many opinions, mostly concurrences, in Establishment Clause cases(continued.)Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressR

2、eceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS22201July 20, 2005The Law of Church and State: SelectedOpinions of Justice OConnorAngie A. WelbornLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryAn examination of Justice OConnors opinions interpreting the EstablishmentClause reveals that she employed differe

3、nt tests depending on the type of governmentactivity at issue. She often and rather consistently applied the so-called “endorsementtest” in cases involving government speech on religious topics, but tended to use hybridapproaches incorporating both the test set forth in Lemon and a neutrality test i

4、n casesinvolving government aid programs. The decisions show that OConnor believed thatthese cases should all be examined carefully with particular attention given to the factsof each, and that the Court should refrain from tying itself to a single test for evaluatingEstablishment Clause cases. Just

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告