[20171127]LSB10033_联邦政府的全体移民权与宪法规定的堕胎权相冲突(下).pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:26845 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-05-01 格式:PDF 页数:3 大小:589.47KB
下载 相关 举报
[20171127]LSB10033_联邦政府的全体移民权与宪法规定的堕胎权相冲突(下).pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共3页
[20171127]LSB10033_联邦政府的全体移民权与宪法规定的堕胎权相冲突(下).pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共3页
[20171127]LSB10033_联邦政府的全体移民权与宪法规定的堕胎权相冲突(下).pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共3页
亲,该文档总共3页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i The Federal Governments Plenary Immigration Power Collides with the Constitutional Right to an Abortion (Part II) November 27, 2017 This Sidebar is the second in a two-part series discussing the en banc decisio

2、n by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (D.C. Circuit) in Garza v. Hargan, affirming a district courts order requiring the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to allow an unaccompanied alien minor in federal custody to have an abortion. An earlier Sidebar, addressing the D.C. C

3、ircuits decision and its impact on abortion rights, is available here. Does an Unaccompanied Alien Minor Detained at the Border have a Constitutional Right to an Abortion? The D.C. Circuits en banc decision in Garza applied longstanding precedent holding that there is a constitutional right to termi

4、nate ones pregnancy, and that the government may not place an “undue burden” on that right. In ruling that Jane Doe, an unaccompanied alien minor in HHS custody, could not be barred by the agency from obtaining an abortion, the Garza panel was not called upon to address a possibly fundamental questi

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告