[20180116]LSB10059_马布里诉麦迪逊案重演!最高法院考虑“司法”权的范围.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:26957 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-30 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:766.27KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180116]LSB10059_马布里诉麦迪逊案重演!最高法院考虑“司法”权的范围.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180116]LSB10059_马布里诉麦迪逊案重演!最高法院考虑“司法”权的范围.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180116]LSB10059_马布里诉麦迪逊案重演!最高法院考虑“司法”权的范围.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180116]LSB10059_马布里诉麦迪逊案重演!最高法院考虑“司法”权的范围.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Marbury v. Madison Returns! The Supreme Court Considers the Scope of “Judicial” Power January 16, 2018 Every first-year law student learns about Marbury v. Madison. In the landmark 1803 opinion by Chief Justice

2、 John Marshall, the Supreme Court established the basis for judicial review and set out the limitations of its own jurisdiction, forming the foundation for the Courts role in U.S. government. It now appears that the scope of one of the major holdings of Marbury is back before the Supreme Court. In D

3、almazzi v. United States, an appeal from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (the “CAAF”), consolidated with Ortiz v. United States and Cox v. United States, the Court has taken the relatively unusual step of granting a third party amicus, University of Virginia (UVA) law professor Aditya Bamz

4、ai, oral argument time in which to argue that Marburys interpretation of the Supreme Courts jurisdiction under Article III prevents the Court from exercising jurisdiction in any appeal from the CAAF. This aspect of Dalmazzi, which is to be argued on January 16, is significant for Congress. The Supre

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告