[20180403]LSB10112_移民诉讼中的外国人能否被无限期拘留?高等法院关于法定权力而非宪法权力的规则 .pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27160 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-12 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:610.89KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180403]LSB10112_移民诉讼中的外国人能否被无限期拘留?高等法院关于法定权力而非宪法权力的规则 .pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20180403]LSB10112_移民诉讼中的外国人能否被无限期拘留?高等法院关于法定权力而非宪法权力的规则 .pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20180403]LSB10112_移民诉讼中的外国人能否被无限期拘留?高等法院关于法定权力而非宪法权力的规则 .pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20180403]LSB10112_移民诉讼中的外国人能否被无限期拘留?高等法院关于法定权力而非宪法权力的规则 .pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20180403]LSB10112_移民诉讼中的外国人能否被无限期拘留?高等法院关于法定权力而非宪法权力的规则 .pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Can Aliens in Immigration Proceedings Be Detained Indefinitely? High Court Rules on Statutory, but not Constitutional Authority Updated April 3, 2018 Recently, the Supreme Court in Jennings v. Rodriguez interpr

2、eted provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as authorizing the potentially indefinite detention of certain categories of aliens, without bond, who are awaiting removal proceedings. The Court reversed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit), whic

3、h upheld a federal district courts injunction requiring aliens detained under one of three statutes to be afforded a bond hearing, and potentially be released from custody, if held longer than six months. Because the indefinite detention of at least some categories of aliens covered by the challenge

4、d statutes would arguably raise constitutional concerns, the Ninth Circuit had construed the statutes so that the period in which they authorized detention without bail was limited to six months. But the Supreme Court ruled that this interpretation was implausible given the statutes text, and the Co

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告