[20180606]LSB10147_外国人侵权法的兴衰.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27322 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-05 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:726.56KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180606]LSB10147_外国人侵权法的兴衰.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180606]LSB10147_外国人侵权法的兴衰.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180606]LSB10147_外国人侵权法的兴衰.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180606]LSB10147_外国人侵权法的兴衰.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i The Rise and Decline of the Alien Tort Statute June 6, 2018 A narrowly divided Supreme Court held in Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC that foreign corporations may not be defendants in suits brought under the Alien Tor

2、t Statute (ATS). In its current form, the ATS provides that “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.” This single-sentence statute has been the subject of inte

3、nse interest in recent decades, as it has evolved from a little-known jurisdictional provision to a prominent vehicle for foreign nationals to seek redress in U.S. courts for injuries caused by human rights offenses and acts of terrorism. In a series of decisions, however, the Supreme Court has plac

4、ed significant limitations on the ability to pursue claims under the ATS, and the High Court has never ruled in a plaintiffs favor in an ATS case. Jesners holding barring foreign corporate liability marks a continuation of this trend, causing some to debate whether the ATS remains a viable mechanism

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告