[20180622]LSB10153_最高法院认为SEC行政法法官是受任命条款约束的“官员”.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27371 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-05 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:717.42KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180622]LSB10153_最高法院认为SEC行政法法官是受任命条款约束的“官员”.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20180622]LSB10153_最高法院认为SEC行政法法官是受任命条款约束的“官员”.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20180622]LSB10153_最高法院认为SEC行政法法官是受任命条款约束的“官员”.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20180622]LSB10153_最高法院认为SEC行政法法官是受任命条款约束的“官员”.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20180622]LSB10153_最高法院认为SEC行政法法官是受任命条款约束的“官员”.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court Holds That SEC Administrative Law Judges Are “Officers” Subject to the Appointments Clause June 22, 2018 On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Lucia v. Securities and Exchang

2、e Commission (SEC), holding that SEC administrative law judges (ALJs) are “Officers of the United States” within the meaning of the Appointments Clause and, as such, must be appointed by the Commission rather than SEC staff. The Court granted Mr. Luciawhose challenge concerned an adverse decision by

3、 an SEC ALJ who was not so appointeda new hearing before a different ALJ. The Supreme Courts decision is as significant for the questions that it resolves (i.e., the officer status of SEC ALJs and the remedy in Mr. Lucias case) as for the legal issues it leaves for later cases. With over 100 SEC cas

4、es involving ALJs pending before the agency when the SEC acted to “ratify the agencys prior appointment” of its five ALJs, and nearly 2,000 ALJs situated in over twenty-five agencies across the federal government (the vast majority of whom serve the Social Security Administration), the specter of ch

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告