[20180702]LSB10164_党派划分选区:最高法院就诉讼地位提供指导并维持法律现状.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27388 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-04 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:643.89KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180702]LSB10164_党派划分选区:最高法院就诉讼地位提供指导并维持法律现状.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20180702]LSB10164_党派划分选区:最高法院就诉讼地位提供指导并维持法律现状.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20180702]LSB10164_党派划分选区:最高法院就诉讼地位提供指导并维持法律现状.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20180702]LSB10164_党派划分选区:最高法院就诉讼地位提供指导并维持法律现状.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20180702]LSB10164_党派划分选区:最高法院就诉讼地位提供指导并维持法律现状.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Partisan Gerrymandering: Supreme Court Provides Guidance on Standing and Maintains Legal Status Quo July 2, 2018 In a redistricting case that some predicted could have resulted in a “blockbuster” ruling, Gill v

2、. Whitford, the Supreme Court issued a more limited, yet still consequential decision. On June 18, 2018 the Supreme Court ruled that in order to establish standing to sue upon a claim of unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering on the basis of vote dilution, challengers must allege injuries to their

3、 interests as voters in individual districts. (Vote dilution arises when district boundaries devalue one citizens vote as compared to others and is accomplished by “packing” certain voters into a few districts, so that they win elections by large margins, and “cracking” certain voters among several

4、districts, so that they fail to achieve a voting majority.) Because the challengers in Gill alleged statewide harm to voters of a particular political partythat is, to voters throughout the state who support the Democratic Partywithout establishing proof of injury to specific voters within a particu

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告