[20180802]LSB10182_D、 C.巡回规则联邦贸易委员会意见书非司法审查的“最终机构行动”.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27459 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-03 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:591.06KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180802]LSB10182_D、 C.巡回规则联邦贸易委员会意见书非司法审查的“最终机构行动”.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20180802]LSB10182_D、 C.巡回规则联邦贸易委员会意见书非司法审查的“最终机构行动”.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20180802]LSB10182_D、 C.巡回规则联邦贸易委员会意见书非司法审查的“最终机构行动”.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20180802]LSB10182_D、 C.巡回规则联邦贸易委员会意见书非司法审查的“最终机构行动”.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20180802]LSB10182_D、 C.巡回规则联邦贸易委员会意见书非司法审查的“最终机构行动”.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i D.C. Circuit Rules FTC Opinion Letter Not “Final Agency Action” Subject to Judicial Review August 2, 2018 Courts will typically only review agency orders, regulations, licenses, and other decisions that a

2、re “final.” In Soundboard Association v. Federal Trade Commission, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) held by a vote of 2-1 that an opinion letter issued by Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission) staff was not “final agency acti

3、on” and, therefore, not judicially reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The opinion letter concluded that telemarketing calls utilizing “soundboard” technologya technology that allows telemarketers to make phone calls consisting of a mix of pre-recorded audio and live discussionw

4、ere subject to the FTCs “robocall” regulations. Petitioners challenged the letter under the APA, both as an unconstitutional abridgment of speech and as a binding regulation which had not been promulgated in compliance with the procedural requirements of the APA. The majority and dissenting opinions

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告