[20181123]LSB10219_反垄断和iPhone:最高法院将考虑App Store客户是否可以起诉苹果垄断.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27700 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-03-29 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:610.36KB
下载 相关 举报
[20181123]LSB10219_反垄断和iPhone:最高法院将考虑App Store客户是否可以起诉苹果垄断.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20181123]LSB10219_反垄断和iPhone:最高法院将考虑App Store客户是否可以起诉苹果垄断.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20181123]LSB10219_反垄断和iPhone:最高法院将考虑App Store客户是否可以起诉苹果垄断.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20181123]LSB10219_反垄断和iPhone:最高法院将考虑App Store客户是否可以起诉苹果垄断.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Antitrust and the iPhone: Supreme Court to Consider Whether App Store Customers Can Sue Apple for Monopolization November 23, 2018 On November 26, 2018, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Apple

2、 v. Pepper, an antitrust case involving the iPhones App Store that may have significant implications for other electronic marketplaces like Google Play, eBay, and StubHub. In Pepper, the Court is considering whether purchasers of iPhone applications (apps) created by third-party developers may sue A

3、pple (which distributes apps on behalf of developers) for monopolizing the market for such apps. Specifically, the Pepper case will require the Court to decide whether a doctrine of antitrust standing known as the “indirect purchaser” rule prevents app purchasers from suing Apple for charging app de

4、velopers monopolistic commissions based on the theory that such commissions ultimately increase app prices. This Legal Sidebar discusses the Pepper litigation and its implications. First, the Sidebar provides an overview of the indirect purchaser rule. Second, the Sidebar reviews the history of the

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告