[20190705]LSB10324_党派划分选区的主张不受联邦法院审查:未来考虑事项.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28344 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-07-05 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:616.75KB
下载 相关 举报
[20190705]LSB10324_党派划分选区的主张不受联邦法院审查:未来考虑事项.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20190705]LSB10324_党派划分选区的主张不受联邦法院审查:未来考虑事项.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20190705]LSB10324_党派划分选区的主张不受联邦法院审查:未来考虑事项.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20190705]LSB10324_党派划分选区的主张不受联邦法院审查:未来考虑事项.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20190705]LSB10324_党派划分选区的主张不受联邦法院审查:未来考虑事项.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Partisan Gerrymandering Claims Not Subject to Federal Court Review: Considerations Going Forward July 5, 2019 Partisan gerrymandering, “the drawing of legislative district lines to subordinate adherents o

2、f one political party and entrench a rival party in power,” is an issue that has vexed the federal courts for more than three decades. On June 27, 2019, the Supreme Court, by a 5 to 4 vote, ruled that claims of unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering are not subject to federal court review because

3、they present non-justiciable political questions, removing the issue from the federal courts purview. In Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek (hereafter Rucho) the Court viewed the Elections Clause of the Constitution as solely assigning disputes about partisan gerrymandering to the state leg

4、islatures, subject to a check by the U.S. Congress. Moreover, in contrast to one-person, one-vote and racial gerrymandering claims, the Court determined that no test exists for adjudicating partisan gerrymandering claims that is both judicially discernible and manageable. However, the Court suggeste

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告