[20190703]LSB10320_法院在个人是否可以起诉质疑州医疗补助取消资助决定的问题上存在分歧:国会考虑事项(第I部分共II部分).pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28347 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-07-03 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:665.77KB
下载 相关 举报
[20190703]LSB10320_法院在个人是否可以起诉质疑州医疗补助取消资助决定的问题上存在分歧:国会考虑事项(第I部分共II部分).pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[20190703]LSB10320_法院在个人是否可以起诉质疑州医疗补助取消资助决定的问题上存在分歧:国会考虑事项(第I部分共II部分).pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[20190703]LSB10320_法院在个人是否可以起诉质疑州医疗补助取消资助决定的问题上存在分歧:国会考虑事项(第I部分共II部分).pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[20190703]LSB10320_法院在个人是否可以起诉质疑州医疗补助取消资助决定的问题上存在分歧:国会考虑事项(第I部分共II部分).pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[20190703]LSB10320_法院在个人是否可以起诉质疑州医疗补助取消资助决定的问题上存在分歧:国会考虑事项(第I部分共II部分).pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Courts Split on Whether Private Individuals Can Sue to Challenge States Medicaid Defunding Decisions: Considerations for Congress (Part I of II) July 3, 2019 Last December, the Supreme Court declined to r

2、eview two cases, Andersen v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Gee v. Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast Inc., in which private litigants challenged their respective states decision to exclude specific health care providersin these cases, Planned Parenthood affiliatesfrom participating in the states Me

3、dicaid program. The plaintiffs argued that the state defendants had violated what is known as the “free-choice-of-provider” provision of the Medicaid Act. Under this provision, which is one of more than 80 federal requirements imposed upon a state Medicaid plan, a state Medicaid plan must ensure tha

4、t “any individual eligible for medical assistance . . . may obtain such assistance from any institution . . . or person, qualified to perform the service or services required . who undertakes to provide him such services . . .” A threshold question in these suits is whether a private party has the r

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告