[20191204]LSB10374_最高法院将不处理专利异议的上诉条款.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28723 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-12-05 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:668.88KB
下载 相关 举报
[20191204]LSB10374_最高法院将不处理专利异议的上诉条款.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20191204]LSB10374_最高法院将不处理专利异议的上诉条款.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20191204]LSB10374_最高法院将不处理专利异议的上诉条款.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20191204]LSB10374_最高法院将不处理专利异议的上诉条款.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20191204]LSB10374_最高法院将不处理专利异议的上诉条款.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court to Address No-Appeal Provision for Patent Challenges December 4, 2019 In 2011, Congress enacted major patent reform in the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). The AIA, among other things,

2、 created inter partes review (IPR), an adversarial procedure during which the U.S. Patent & Trademark Offices (PTOs) Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) reviews the validity of issued patents. IPR allows any person, other than the patentee, to petition the PTAB for review. After receiving a petition,

3、 the PTAB may institute review if it determines that “there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail.” Under 35 U.S.C. 314(d) (the so-called “no-appeal provision”), moreover, the PTABs determination to institute IPR “under this section shall be final and nonappealable.” In Thryv,

4、 Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, the Supreme Court is expected to address the breadth of the no-appeal provision; specifically, whether a party may appeal the PTABs determination that an IPR is not time-barred. The decision in Click-to-Call may have considerable implications both for the sco

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告