[20200121]LSB10396_在弹劾审判中获得证人:强制、行政特权和法院.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28844 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-01-21 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:616.25KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200121]LSB10396_在弹劾审判中获得证人:强制、行政特权和法院.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20200121]LSB10396_在弹劾审判中获得证人:强制、行政特权和法院.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20200121]LSB10396_在弹劾审判中获得证人:强制、行政特权和法院.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20200121]LSB10396_在弹劾审判中获得证人:强制、行政特权和法院.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20200121]LSB10396_在弹劾审判中获得证人:强制、行政特权和法院.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Obtaining Witnesses In an Impeachment Trial: Compulsion, Executive Privilege, and the Courts January 21, 2020 The Constitution grants the Senate wide-ranging discretion in the exercise of its “sole Power

2、to try all Impeachments.” Beyond the requirements that the Constitution expressly sets forth (Senators sitting in an impeachment trial must be under oath; a two-thirds vote is required to convict; and the Chief Justice presides over a presidential impeachment), the remaining details of any impeachme

3、nt trial largely lay with the Senate. One procedural choice in the impending trial of President Donald Trump that has received sustained attention is whether the Senate will hear from witnesses, and if so, how many and in what form. The past presidential impeachment trials provide two very different

4、 approaches. During the trial of Andrew Johnson, the Senate took live testimony from more than 40 witnesses, subjecting most to examination by House Managers (acting as prosecutors in the impeachment trial) and the Presidents counsel. In contrast, the Senate took a more constrained approach in the t

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告