[20200306]LSB10416_如果您扫描以下内容请与我联系:强制解密的合宪性划分了法院.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28984 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-03-06 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:609.94KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200306]LSB10416_如果您扫描以下内容请与我联系:强制解密的合宪性划分了法院.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20200306]LSB10416_如果您扫描以下内容请与我联系:强制解密的合宪性划分了法院.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20200306]LSB10416_如果您扫描以下内容请与我联系:强制解密的合宪性划分了法院.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20200306]LSB10416_如果您扫描以下内容请与我联系:强制解密的合宪性划分了法院.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20200306]LSB10416_如果您扫描以下内容请与我联系:强制解密的合宪性划分了法院.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Catch Me If You Scan: Constitutionality of Compelled Decryption Divides the Courts March 6, 2020 In the digital age, courts have been tasked with determining how longstanding constitutional protections fo

2、r criminal suspects and defendants apply to new forms of technology like smartphones that are portable, nearly ubiquitous, and increasingly capable of revealing extremely intimate details of their owners lives. Many court cases and legal commentators have focused on when law enforcement searches of

3、electronic devices are permissible under the Fourth Amendment. That Amendment protects against unreasonable “searches and seizures” by the government, and in recent cases such as Riley v. California and Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court has recognized that a search of digital information

4、 associated with a mobile device often requires a warrant supported by probable cause to be considered “reasonable” under the Fourth Amendment. Obtaining a warrant to search a smartphone or other electronic, data-containing device does not guarantee that law enforcement can access the devices data,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告