[20200716]LSB10519_连锁反应:评估最高法院风险走廊裁决的影响.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:29557 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-07-16 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:629.60KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200716]LSB10519_连锁反应:评估最高法院风险走廊裁决的影响.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20200716]LSB10519_连锁反应:评估最高法院风险走廊裁决的影响.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20200716]LSB10519_连锁反应:评估最高法院风险走廊裁决的影响.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20200716]LSB10519_连锁反应:评估最高法院风险走廊裁决的影响.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20200716]LSB10519_连锁反应:评估最高法院风险走廊裁决的影响.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Ripple Effects: Assessing Impacts of the Supreme Courts Risk Corridors Decision July 16, 2020 Although most eyes tracking Affordable Care Act (ACA) litigation may be drawn to California v. Texas during th

2、e Supreme Courts upcoming term, the Court handed down an ACA decision this past term that may have numerous ripple effects in other ACA cases and programs. Specifically, in Maine Community Health Options v. United States, the Court considered whether the United States is obligated, under the tempora

3、ry Risk Corridors Program, to make payments to health insurance providers who offered coverage at a loss in the ACAs individual and small group markets. Though the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) calculated insurer payments for the 2014, 2015, and 2016 program years, HHS paid a fractio

4、n of that amount. Limitations in HHSs annual appropriations acts prevented use of annually appropriated funds to make payment in full. Despite this lack of available appropriations, the Court held that the United States incurred obligations to insurers under the Risk Corridors statute for which insu

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告