[20200724]LSB10527_这片土地是谁的土地?McGirt诉俄克拉荷马州案的裁决及国会的考虑.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:29578 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-07-27 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:671.82KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200724]LSB10527_这片土地是谁的土地?McGirt诉俄克拉荷马州案的裁决及国会的考虑.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20200724]LSB10527_这片土地是谁的土地?McGirt诉俄克拉荷马州案的裁决及国会的考虑.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20200724]LSB10527_这片土地是谁的土地?McGirt诉俄克拉荷马州案的裁决及国会的考虑.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20200724]LSB10527_这片土地是谁的土地?McGirt诉俄克拉荷马州案的裁决及国会的考虑.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20200724]LSB10527_这片土地是谁的土地?McGirt诉俄克拉荷马州案的裁决及国会的考虑.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i This Land Is Whose Land? The McGirt v. Oklahoma Decision and Considerations for Congress July 24, 2020 On July 9, 2020, the Supreme Court announced its decision in McGirt v. Oklahomahailed by some as the

2、“most significant Indian Law case of the century.” In a 5-4 ruling, the Court held that land reserved for the Muscogee (Creek) Nation in the 19th century remained “Indian country” for criminal jurisdiction purposes. In an opinion authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the Court held that Congress had est

3、ablished a reservation for the tribe (Creek Nation). Despite creating the State of Oklahoma and limiting tribal sovereignty within that area in the intervening years, the Court further held that Congress had never disestablished the Creek reservation in eastern Oklahoma. This Legal Sidebar explains

4、the origins of the case, sketches the contours of the decision, explores what remains undecided or unknown, and discusses what Congress could do to clarify, change, or cement this new status quo. How the Question Came to the Supreme Court In 2018, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider an

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告