[20210316]LSB10581_对民事没收车辆的扣押提出异议:什么程序到期?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:30449 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2021-03-16 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:688.59KB
下载 相关 举报
[20210316]LSB10581_对民事没收车辆的扣押提出异议:什么程序到期?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20210316]LSB10581_对民事没收车辆的扣押提出异议:什么程序到期?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20210316]LSB10581_对民事没收车辆的扣押提出异议:什么程序到期?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20210316]LSB10581_对民事没收车辆的扣押提出异议:什么程序到期?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20210316]LSB10581_对民事没收车辆的扣押提出异议:什么程序到期?.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Contesting the Seizure of Vehicles Under Civil Forfeiture: What Process Is Due? March 16, 2021 In September 2015, United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents seized Gerardo Serranos F-250 pic

2、kup truck at the U.S.-Mexico border for allegedly attempting to smuggle “munitions of war.” CBP held the vehicle for almost two years while Serrano contested its forfeiture. Serrano sued the agency, arguing that the Due Process Clause requires the government to provide a prompt, post-seizure judicia

3、l hearing before confiscating property under federal civil forfeiture laws. Conducting the balancing test required under prevailing Supreme Court precedent, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ultimately held in Serrano v. Customs and Border Patrol that the existing legal proces

4、s provided under the federal civil forfeiture laws was sufficient to satisfy due process. This decision is in some tension with a ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which invalidated a New York City civil forfeiture law for failing to provide independent judicial

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告