[20210510]LSB10597_谷歌诉甲骨文:最高法院在Landmark软件版权案中对谷歌的裁决.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:30680 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2021-05-10 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:769.59KB
下载 相关 举报
[20210510]LSB10597_谷歌诉甲骨文:最高法院在Landmark软件版权案中对谷歌的裁决.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[20210510]LSB10597_谷歌诉甲骨文:最高法院在Landmark软件版权案中对谷歌的裁决.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[20210510]LSB10597_谷歌诉甲骨文:最高法院在Landmark软件版权案中对谷歌的裁决.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[20210510]LSB10597_谷歌诉甲骨文:最高法院在Landmark软件版权案中对谷歌的裁决.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[20210510]LSB10597_谷歌诉甲骨文:最高法院在Landmark软件版权案中对谷歌的裁决.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Google v. Oracle: Supreme Court Rules for Google in Landmark Software Copyright Case May 10, 2021 On April 5, 2021, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Google LLC v. Oracle America

2、 Inc., the culmination of a decade-long software copyright dispute between the two tech giants. Resolving what observers have hailed as the “copyright case of the century,” the Court held in Googles favor, finding that Googles copying of the “declaring code” of the Java SE application programming in

3、terface (API) was a fair use and thus did not infringe Oracles copyright in Java. As a formal matter, the Courts holding was relatively narrow, concluding that Googles copying of certain code from the Java APIwhat the Court characterized as “reimplementation of a user interface”was a fair use under

4、the “case-by-case” balancing of the statutory fair use factors. As a practical matter, however, the Courts decision is likely to have major significance for the software industry, and may also potentially affect fair use for other copyrightable subject mattersuch as art, music, and television. This

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告