[20210629]LSB10615_最高法院保留专利审判和上诉委员会但有更大的行政监督.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:30866 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2021-06-29 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:727.11KB
下载 相关 举报
[20210629]LSB10615_最高法院保留专利审判和上诉委员会但有更大的行政监督.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[20210629]LSB10615_最高法院保留专利审判和上诉委员会但有更大的行政监督.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[20210629]LSB10615_最高法院保留专利审判和上诉委员会但有更大的行政监督.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[20210629]LSB10615_最高法院保留专利审判和上诉委员会但有更大的行政监督.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[20210629]LSB10615_最高法院保留专利审判和上诉委员会但有更大的行政监督.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court Preserves Patent Trial and Appeal Board, but with Greater Executive Oversight June 29, 2021 In 2011, Congress enacted a major patent reform bill, the LeahySmith America Invents Act (AIA). Am

2、ong other things, the AIA created new adversarial administrative proceedings within the Patent and Trademark Office to review the validity of already-issued patents and cancel those that should not have been issued. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) conducts these proceedings, which include i

3、nter partes review (IPR) (as well as other procedures like post-grant review). PTAB consists primarily of hundreds of administrative patent judges (APJs), who sit in panels of three to rule on the validity of patents challenged through IPR. The Secretary of Commerce (the Secretary), in consultation

4、with the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office (the Director), appoints APJs to the PTAB. Because of the economic importance of patent rights, millions or even billions of dollars may be at stake in these proceedings. The Supreme Court agreed to hear United States v. Arthrex to determine wheth

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告