[20220113]LSB10686_宪法分析的模式:历史实践(第8部分).pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:31759 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2022-01-13 格式:PDF 页数:3 大小:692.54KB
下载 相关 举报
[20220113]LSB10686_宪法分析的模式:历史实践(第8部分).pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共3页
[20220113]LSB10686_宪法分析的模式:历史实践(第8部分).pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共3页
[20220113]LSB10686_宪法分析的模式:历史实践(第8部分).pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共3页
亲,该文档总共3页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i The Modes of Constitutional Analysis: Historical Practices (Part 8) January 13, 2022 This Legal Sidebar Post is the eighth in a nine-part series that discusses certain “methods” or “modes” of analysis tha

2、t the Supreme Court has employed to determine the meaning of a provision within the Constitution. (For additional background on this topic and citations to relevant sources, please see CRS Report R45129, Modes of Constitutional Interpretation.) Judicial precedents are not the only type of precedents

3、 that are arguably relevant to constitutional interpretation. Prior decisions of the political branches, particularly their long-established, historical practices, are an important source of constitutional meaning to many judges, academics, and lawyers. Courts have viewed historical practices as a s

4、ource of the Constitutions meaning in cases involving questions about the separation of powers, federalism, and individual rights, particularly when the text provides no clear answer. An example of judicial reliance on historical practicessometimes described as traditionin constitutional interpretat

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告