[20220426]LSB10734_竞选资金和第一修正案:最高法院认为偿还候选人贷款的限制符合宪法.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:32362 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2022-04-26 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:747.38KB
下载 相关 举报
[20220426]LSB10734_竞选资金和第一修正案:最高法院认为偿还候选人贷款的限制符合宪法.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[20220426]LSB10734_竞选资金和第一修正案:最高法院认为偿还候选人贷款的限制符合宪法.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[20220426]LSB10734_竞选资金和第一修正案:最高法院认为偿还候选人贷款的限制符合宪法.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[20220426]LSB10734_竞选资金和第一修正案:最高法院认为偿还候选人贷款的限制符合宪法.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[20220426]LSB10734_竞选资金和第一修正案:最高法院认为偿还候选人贷款的限制符合宪法.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Campaign Finance and the First Amendment: Supreme Court Considers Constitutionality of Limits on Repayment of Candidate Loans April 26, 2022 Campaign finance is back before the Supreme Court. In Federal E

2、lection Commission (FEC) v. Ted Cruz for Senate, the Court is faced with a challenge to a federal campaign finance law that establishes a $250,000 limit on the amount of post-election campaign contributions that may be used to repay a candidate for personal campaign loans made pre-election. Specific

3、ally, the Court is evaluating whether the appellees, Senator Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz and his campaign committee, Ted Cruz for Senate (Senator Cruzs principal campaign committee), have standing to challenge the limit and, if so, whether the limit violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendmen

4、t. In June 2021, a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia invalidated the limit as unconstitutional under the First Amendment. If the Court adopts the reasoning of the district court, this case could affect the constitutionality of other current campaign finance la

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告