1、1 For an examination of these decisions, see CRS Report RL33444, The Individuals withDisabilities Education Act (IDEA): Supreme Court Decisions, by (name redacted). 2 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.3 For a more detailed discussion of the congressional intent behind the enactment of P.L. 94-142, see CRS Repor
2、t 95-669, The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: CongressionalIntent, by (name redacted). IDEA has undergone several reauthorizations, including the most(continued.)Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS22465Ju
3、ne 30, 2006The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): The Supreme Court Denies Expert Fees in Arlington Central School District v. Murphyname redactedLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryThe Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides federal fundingfor the ed
4、ucation of children with disabilities and requires, as a condition for the receiptof such funds, the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE). It alsocontains detailed due process procedures, including a provision for attorneys fees. TheSupreme Court has examined various issues under