1、For historical information, see Congressional Research Service, Government Performance1and Results Act, PL. 103-62 Implementation Through Fall 1996 and Issues for the 105thCongress, by Genevieve J. Knezo, Report 97-70 SPR, 24 December 1996: 93 pp; See alsoCongressional Research Service, Government P
2、erformance and Results Act: Implications forCongressional Oversight, by Frederick M. Kaiser and Virginia A. McMurtry, Report 97-382, 24March 1997: 39 pp.Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS Web97-1028 STMUpdated March 6, 1998Government
3、 Performance and Results Act:Implementation During 1997 and Issues of PossibleConcern, 105 Congress, Second SessionthGenevieve J. KnezoSpecialist in Science and TechnologyScience, Technology, and Medicine DivisionSummaryOn September 30, 1997, federal agencies submitted to Congress strategic plansman
4、dated by the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, P.L. 103-62, alsocalled the “Results Act,” and GPRA. A government-wide performance plan wassubmitted with the Presidents FY1999 budget. The required performance plans andmeasures will be transmitted to Congress sometime after the President