[20000309]RS20491_电力重组和零售互惠要求的合宪性.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:15277 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2000-03-09 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:51.30KB
下载 相关 举报
[20000309]RS20491_电力重组和零售互惠要求的合宪性.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[20000309]RS20491_电力重组和零售互惠要求的合宪性.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[20000309]RS20491_电力重组和零售互惠要求的合宪性.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[20000309]RS20491_电力重组和零售互惠要求的合宪性.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[20000309]RS20491_电力重组和零售互惠要求的合宪性.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、1 The electricity restructuring legislation of Delaware, Illinois, Montana, and Pennsylvania each(continued.)Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS20491March 9, 2000Electricity Restructuring and the Constitutionalityof R

2、etail Reciprocity Requirements(name redacted)Legislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryRetail reciprocity requirements have been included in the electricity restructuringlegislation of at least four states. These requirements mandate generally that out-of-stateutilities which operate in a stat

3、e “closed” to retail competition cannot market power toretail consumers in the “open” state. Because state reciprocity requirements enactedwithout congressional authorization are probably unconstitutional under the CommerceClause of the U.S. Constitution, Congress would have to include a reciprocity

4、 provisionin federal electricity restructuring legislation if it wants to support the view that such aprovision will increase competition. This report reviews the treatment of statereciprocity requirements by the U.S. Supreme Court and discusses Congress powerunder the Commerce Clause.Seven of the e

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告