[20001205]RS20228_清洁空气标准:最高法院同意复审.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:15493 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2022-06-24 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:37.17KB
下载 相关 举报
[20001205]RS20228_清洁空气标准:最高法院同意复审.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[20001205]RS20228_清洁空气标准:最高法院同意复审.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[20001205]RS20228_清洁空气标准:最高法院同意复审.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[20001205]RS20228_清洁空气标准:最高法院同意复审.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[20001205]RS20228_清洁空气标准:最高法院同意复审.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、Congressional Research Service ? The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS20228Updated December 5, 2000Clean Air Standards: The Supreme Court Agreesto Review American Trucking Associations v. EPA Robert MeltzLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionJames

2、 E. McCarthySpecialist in Environmental PolicyResources, Science, and Industry DivisionSummaryIn 1999, in American Trucking Assns, Inc. v. U.S. EPA, a U.S. Court of Appealsruled that deficiencies in EPAs promulgation of revised national ambient air qualitystandards for ozone and particulate matter r

3、equired that they be remanded to the agencyfor further consideration. The decision was controversial, in part because it relied on along-moribund legal principle known as the nondelegation doctrine. The courts use ofthis doctrine, if upheld, has implications for many delegations of congressional aut

4、horityto agencies. In addition, its holding that the revised ozone ambient standard cannot beenforced has sparked debate. By itself, however, the decision is unlikely to have majorshort-term effects on the ozone and particulate matter control programs. In May, 2000, the Supreme Court agreed to revie

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告