[20030716]RS21572_死刑:2002-2003年最高法院判决摘要.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:16909 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2003-07-16 格式:PDF 页数:7 大小:62.93KB
下载 相关 举报
[20030716]RS21572_死刑:2002-2003年最高法院判决摘要.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
[20030716]RS21572_死刑:2002-2003年最高法院判决摘要.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
[20030716]RS21572_死刑:2002-2003年最高法院判决摘要.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
[20030716]RS21572_死刑:2002-2003年最高法院判决摘要.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
[20030716]RS21572_死刑:2002-2003年最高法院判决摘要.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、1536 U.S. 584 (2002).2536 U.S. 304 (2002).Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS21572July 16, 2003Capital Punishment: Summary of SupremeCourt Decisions of the 2002-2003 TermPaul Starett Wallace, Jr.Specialist in American

2、 Public LawAmerican Law DivisionSummaryIn its 2001-2002 term, for the first time since 1988, the Supreme Court placedsubstantial new restrictions on the powers to impose the death penalty. In Ring v.Arizona1, it overturned a death sentence imposed by a judge, holding that defendantshave a Sixth Amen

3、dment right to have a jurynot a judgedetermine whetheraggravating factors warrant the imposition of the death penalty. In Atkins v. Virginia,2it held that the execution of the mentally retarded is cruel and unusual punishment. Inthe2002-2003term,inMiller-Elv.CockrelltheCourtimposedanadditionalrestri

4、ctionwhen it decided that an African-American death row inmate should have been allowedto appeal the rejection of his contention that the jury that convicted him was screenedby prosecutors in a racially biased way. In Wiggins v. Smith, it held that a capitaldefendant had been denied effective counse

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告