[20050502]RS22132_查达之后的立法否决权.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:18136 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2005-05-02 格式:PDF 页数:7 大小:56.36KB
下载 相关 举报
[20050502]RS22132_查达之后的立法否决权.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
[20050502]RS22132_查达之后的立法否决权.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
[20050502]RS22132_查达之后的立法否决权.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
[20050502]RS22132_查达之后的立法否决权.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
[20050502]RS22132_查达之后的立法否决权.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS22132May 2, 2005Legislative Vetoes After Chadhaname redactedSenior Specialist in Separation of PowersGovernment and Finance DivisionSummaryIn INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983), the

2、Supreme Court struck downCongresss use of the “legislative veto,” a device used for half a century to controlcertain activities in the executive branch. Congress had delegated power to executiveofficials on the condition that Congress could control their decisions without having topass another law.

3、These legislative controls, short of a public law, included one-housevetoes, two-house vetoes, and committee vetoes. Congress no longer relies on one-house or two-house vetoes, but committee and subcommittee vetoes continue to be apart of executive-legislative accommodations. This report will be upd

4、ated as eventswarrant.The Chadha CaseCongress often enacts limitations, prohibitions, and provisos in statutes that preventagencies from engaging in certain actions or activities. In INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919(1983), the Supreme Court addressed a particular type of “legislative veto,” an oversightm

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告