[20060619]RS22459_2006年立法分项否决法案:三个版本的比较.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:18978 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2016-03-02 格式:PDF 页数:6 大小:34.99KB
下载 相关 举报
[20060619]RS22459_2006年立法分项否决法案:三个版本的比较.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
[20060619]RS22459_2006年立法分项否决法案:三个版本的比较.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
[20060619]RS22459_2006年立法分项否决法案:三个版本的比较.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
[20060619]RS22459_2006年立法分项否决法案:三个版本的比较.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
[20060619]RS22459_2006年立法分项否决法案:三个版本的比较.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、1 The Line Item Veto Act of 1996 was held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1998(Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417). For further background, see CRS Issue BriefIB89148, Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals, by Virginia A. McMurtry; and CRSReport RS22425, Legislative Line Item

2、Veto Act and Other Expedited Rescission Bills: BriefIntroduction, by Virginia A. McMurtry. Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS22459June 19, 2006Legislative Line Item Veto Act of 2006:Comparison of Three VersionsVirgin

3、ia A. McMurtrySpecialist in American National GovernmentGovernment and Finance DivisionSummaryPresident George W. Bush has repeatedly called for granting line item vetoauthority to the President, and an Administration draft was sent to Congress on March6, 2006. That bill, the Legislative Line Item V

4、eto Act (LLIVA) of 2006, was introducedthe following day as S. 2381 and H.R. 4890. This report compares features of H.R.4890/S. 2381 as introduced, H.R. 4890 as approved by the House Budget and RulesCommittees, and Title I of S. 3521(likewise titled LLIVA). This report will be updatedas events may w

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告