[20171019]LSB10015_在室内鸣笛:根据多德-弗兰克法案内部举报人能否起诉进行报复?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:26767 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-05-10 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:718.74KB
下载 相关 举报
[20171019]LSB10015_在室内鸣笛:根据多德-弗兰克法案内部举报人能否起诉进行报复?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20171019]LSB10015_在室内鸣笛:根据多德-弗兰克法案内部举报人能否起诉进行报复?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20171019]LSB10015_在室内鸣笛:根据多德-弗兰克法案内部举报人能否起诉进行报复?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20171019]LSB10015_在室内鸣笛:根据多德-弗兰克法案内部举报人能否起诉进行报复?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Blowing the Whistle Indoors: Can Internal Whistleblowers Sue for Retaliation Under Dodd-Frank? October 19, 2017 In the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (also known as Dodd-Frank), Congr

2、ess established new incentives and protections for whistleblowers who report certain violations of securities laws. This November, in Digital Realty Trust Incorporated v. Somers, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument on the scope of who may qualify as a “whistleblower” for purposes of

3、 the Acts anti-retaliation provisions. Specifically, the Court will consider whether internal whistleblowersi.e., those who report violations within their organizations but not to the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission)can sue their employers for retaliation under the Act. The dispute in

4、 Digital Realty, which centers on the interplay between Dodd-Franks definition of a “whistleblower” and the anti-retaliation provisions reference to disclosures made pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, raises significant issues not only for securities law enforcement and companies internal complianc

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告