[20171101]LSB10021_联邦机构不同意第七篇是否禁止性取向歧视 .pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:26790 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-05-08 格式:PDF 页数:3 大小:579.27KB
下载 相关 举报
[20171101]LSB10021_联邦机构不同意第七篇是否禁止性取向歧视 .pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共3页
[20171101]LSB10021_联邦机构不同意第七篇是否禁止性取向歧视 .pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共3页
[20171101]LSB10021_联邦机构不同意第七篇是否禁止性取向歧视 .pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共3页
亲,该文档总共3页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Federal Agencies Disagree Whether Sexual Orientation Discrimination Is Prohibited by Title VII November 1, 2017 If an employer fires an employee because of sexual orientation, is that a form of unlawful discrim

2、ination “because of sex” under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act? After hearing oral argument on September 26, 2017, in Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Second Circuit), sitting en banc, is poised to address this significant legal question against a

3、backdrop of conflicting views from federal courts of appeals and two federal agencies. While Title VII makes it unlawful to discriminate “because of such individuals race, color, religion, sex, or national origin,” its statutory text does not expressly address “sexual orientation.” In Zarda, the pla

4、intiff argued that Altitude Express violated Title VII when it fired Donald Zarda because of his sexual orientation, after he told a client he was gay. His former employer responded that it fired him because of various complaints by a client. A panel of the Second Circuit held that Zardas Title VII

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告