[20171114]IN10817_《预算控制法》自由支配支出上限对持续解决方案的影响.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:26817 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2017-11-14 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:345.98KB
下载 相关 举报
[20171114]IN10817_《预算控制法》自由支配支出上限对持续解决方案的影响.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20171114]IN10817_《预算控制法》自由支配支出上限对持续解决方案的影响.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20171114]IN10817_《预算控制法》自由支配支出上限对持续解决方案的影响.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20171114]IN10817_《预算控制法》自由支配支出上限对持续解决方案的影响.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、 CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress INSIGHTINSIGHTi i Impact of the Budget Control Act Discretionary Spending Caps on a Continuing Resolution name redacted Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process name redacted Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process Nov

2、ember 14, 2017 What are the requirements of the BCA for FY2018 appropriations? Appropriations enacted for FY2018 are subject to two statutory discretionary spending limits established by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA): One applies to defense discretionary spending, and the other applies to non

3、defense discretionary spending. The defense spending limit for FY2018 is $549 billion and applies to discretionary spending in budget function 050 (national defense) only. The nondefense spending limit for FY2018 is $516 billion and applies to discretionary spending in all other budget functions. Th

4、e BCA stipulates that some spending is effectively exempt from the limits, such as appropriations designated as emergency requirements or for overseas contingency operations. If appropriations are enacted that exceed either the defense or nondefense discretionary limits, a sequester would be trigger

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告