[20171212]LSB10044_起诉赛百味:什么时候集体诉讼和解只对律师有利?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:26883 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-05-14 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:735.55KB
下载 相关 举报
[20171212]LSB10044_起诉赛百味:什么时候集体诉讼和解只对律师有利?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20171212]LSB10044_起诉赛百味:什么时候集体诉讼和解只对律师有利?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20171212]LSB10044_起诉赛百味:什么时候集体诉讼和解只对律师有利?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20171212]LSB10044_起诉赛百味:什么时候集体诉讼和解只对律师有利?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Suing Subway: When Does a Class Action Settlement Benefit Only the Lawyers? December 12, 2017 In 2013, an Australian teenager measured a sandwich he purchased from a Subway restaurant and discovered that his “f

2、ootlong” sandwich was missing an inch. After the teen posted his discovery on social media, his post went viral, and a group of consumers commenced a class action lawsuit against the restaurant chain alleging that its sandwiches were shorter than advertised. The parties ultimately agreed to settle t

3、heir dispute on the condition that Subway (1) inspect and measure its baked rolls to ensure that its sandwiches were at least 12 inches in length; and (2) pay plaintiffs counsel over half a million dollars in attorney fees. In a recent decision, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Cir

4、cuit rejected this proposed settlement. The Court ruled that the settlement violated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures requirement that class action settlements be “fair, reasonable, and adequate” because the settlement did not meaningfully benefit Subways customers, but instead solely benefited

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告