[20180109]LSB10053_最高法院将审理选民名册案件:这意味着什么?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:26919 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-30 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:588.77KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180109]LSB10053_最高法院将审理选民名册案件:这意味着什么?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180109]LSB10053_最高法院将审理选民名册案件:这意味着什么?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180109]LSB10053_最高法院将审理选民名册案件:这意味着什么?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180109]LSB10053_最高法院将审理选民名册案件:这意味着什么?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court to Hear Voter Roll Case: What Are the Implications? January 9, 2018 In what has been called a “potentially major case on voting rights,” on January 10, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court is to hear oral

2、 argument in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute. Husted involves the question of whether an Ohio process for removing or “purging” names from its official voter registration lists violates the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Specifically, the “Supplemental Process” for voter roll mainten

3、ance at issue in Husted involves the Ohio secretary of states offices removal of a registered voters name from the state voter rolls if the individualafter a two-year period of voter inactivitydoes not vote for four more years (including two general federal elections), and does not either (1) respon

4、d to a mailed confirmation notice or (2) reregister to vote. (Not at issue in Husted, Ohio also has a primary process for voter roll maintenance that utilizes the postal services change-of-address system.) At the same time, the NVRA prohibits states from removing an individuals name from its voter r

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告