[20180116]LSB10020_更新日期:最高法院是否会处理各州要求零售商对互联网销售征税的权力?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:26954 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-30 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:685.43KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180116]LSB10020_更新日期:最高法院是否会处理各州要求零售商对互联网销售征税的权力?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180116]LSB10020_更新日期:最高法院是否会处理各州要求零售商对互联网销售征税的权力?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180116]LSB10020_更新日期:最高法院是否会处理各州要求零售商对互联网销售征税的权力?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180116]LSB10020_更新日期:最高法院是否会处理各州要求零售商对互联网销售征税的权力?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i UPDATED: Will the Supreme Court Address States Power to Require that Retailers Tax Internet Sales? Updated January 16, 2018 UPDATE January 16, 2018: On January 12, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted South Dak

2、otas petition to hear the case South Dakota v. Wayfair. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled. The original post from October 26, 2017, follows below. On October 2, 2017, South Dakota petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a decision by its highest state court that struck down a state law re

3、quiring that certain large retailers without a physical presence in South Dakota collect and remit taxes on Internet sales and other remote sales made to the states residents. The case, South Dakota v. Wayfair, is notable because the South Dakota law imposing the tax collection obligations is clearl

4、y, and intentionally, unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Courts holding in the 1992 case Quill v. North Dakota. The state enacted the law with the hopes of challenging Quill, with the legislative findings explaining that the law “is necessary” in light of the “urgent need for the Supreme Court

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告