[20180315]LSB10100_管辖权剥离:国会什么时候可以禁止法院审理案件?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27120 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-30 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:674.46KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180315]LSB10100_管辖权剥离:国会什么时候可以禁止法院审理案件?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180315]LSB10100_管辖权剥离:国会什么时候可以禁止法院审理案件?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180315]LSB10100_管辖权剥离:国会什么时候可以禁止法院审理案件?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180315]LSB10100_管辖权剥离:国会什么时候可以禁止法院审理案件?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Jurisdiction Stripping: When May Congress Prohibit the Courts from Hearing a Case? March 15, 2018 The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Patchak v. Zinke, a case implicating a host of difficult

2、legal issues concerning the respective powers of Congress and the judiciary. Patchak ultimately upheld the Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act (Gun Lake Act) against a separation-of-powers challenge. However, because a majority of the Court could not agree on the legal basis for its decision, Patc

3、haks ultimate meaning with respect to Congresss power over the courts remains uncertain. The various opinions in Patchak signal sharp divisions on the Court concerning the scope of Congresss power to “strip” the jurisdiction of federal courts. Whereas at least four Justices appear to view that power

4、 as being “plenary” in nature, at least four other Justices embrace a more restricted view of Congresss authority. Patchak also implicates several other important issues related to the law of federal courts, including whether a particular law alters a courts jurisdiction, as well as what Congress mu

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告