[20180402]LSB10110_最高法院本学期审议第二党派选区划分案件.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27152 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-03-01 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:615.21KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180402]LSB10110_最高法院本学期审议第二党派选区划分案件.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180402]LSB10110_最高法院本学期审议第二党派选区划分案件.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180402]LSB10110_最高法院本学期审议第二党派选区划分案件.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180402]LSB10110_最高法院本学期审议第二党派选区划分案件.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court Considering Second Partisan Gerrymandering Case This Term April 2, 2018 For a second time during the current term, the U.S. Supreme Court is considering a claim of unconstitutional partisan gerrym

2、andering. On March 28, 2018, the Court heard oral argument in Benisek v. Lamone, involving a challenge to a Maryland congressional district. In October 2017, the Court heard oral argument in Gill v. Whitford, involving a similar challenge to a Wisconsin state legislative redistricting plan. While th

3、e Court has invalidated redistricting maps because of unconstitutional racial gerrymandering, it has not overturned a map because of partisan gerrymandering. As defined by the Court, partisan gerrymandering is “the drawing of legislative district lines to subordinate adherents of one political party

4、 and entrench a rival party in power.” A decision in these cases is expected by June 2018. Supreme Court Precedent In prior cases presenting a claim of unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering, the Supreme Court has left open the possibility that such claims could be judicially reviewable, but has b

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告