[20180416]LSB10122_法院“公平解读”FLSA后汽车服务顾问不得加班.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27201 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-10 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:568.43KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180416]LSB10122_法院“公平解读”FLSA后汽车服务顾问不得加班.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180416]LSB10122_法院“公平解读”FLSA后汽车服务顾问不得加班.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180416]LSB10122_法院“公平解读”FLSA后汽车服务顾问不得加班.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180416]LSB10122_法院“公平解读”FLSA后汽车服务顾问不得加班.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i No Overtime for Auto Service Advisors after Courts “Fair Reading” of the FLSA April 16, 2018 The Supreme Court concluded recently that car dealership employees who discuss service options with customers are exe

2、mpt from the Fair Labor Standards Acts (FLSA) overtime pay requirement. In Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, the Court determined that these so-called “service advisors” fell within the statutes exemption for “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles.

3、” While the Courts decision would seem to affect only a small group of employees, it is notable for what it said with regard to interpreting the FLSA. Justice Thomas, writing for the majority, rejected the long-followed principle that the FLSAs exemptions should be construed narrowly to promote the

4、statutes remedial purpose. The majority maintained that the exemptions are entitled to nothing more than a “fair reading” because the FLSA “gives no textual indication that its exemptions should be construed narrowly . . .” Application of this new fair reading standard could result in a greater numb

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告