[20180613]LSB10095_更新时间:集体诉讼又回到了最高法院:船级社认证的法定期限和“系列再认证”.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27347 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-08 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:785.09KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180613]LSB10095_更新时间:集体诉讼又回到了最高法院:船级社认证的法定期限和“系列再认证”.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20180613]LSB10095_更新时间:集体诉讼又回到了最高法院:船级社认证的法定期限和“系列再认证”.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20180613]LSB10095_更新时间:集体诉讼又回到了最高法院:船级社认证的法定期限和“系列再认证”.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20180613]LSB10095_更新时间:集体诉讼又回到了最高法院:船级社认证的法定期限和“系列再认证”.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20180613]LSB10095_更新时间:集体诉讼又回到了最高法院:船级社认证的法定期限和“系列再认证”.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i UPDATE: Class Actions are Back at the Supreme Court: Statutory Time Limits and “Serial Relitigation” of Class Certification Updated June 13, 2018 UPDATE: On June 11, 2018, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed

2、 the Ninth Circuit in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh. In an opinion by Justice Ginsburg for eight of the Justices, the Court concluded that equitable tolling of statutes of limitation should not apply to subsequent class actions. The Court explained that the American Pipe rule, which provides that a c

3、lass suit will toll the running of a statute of limitations for members of the class that either intervene in existing class suits or file individual suits after the court has found a suit inappropriate for class treatment, does not apply to subsequent class actions. The Court noted that a contrary

4、rule would undermine judicial efficiency by allowing class claimants to serially re-litigate class actions, allowing class plaintiffs “limitless bites at the apple.” Justice Sotomayor concurred in the judgment, but argued that the Courts limitation on American Pipe tolling should only have been appl

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告