1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress InsightInsight Army Futures Command (AFC) Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces Updated September 10, 2018 The Issue The Armys post-Cold War development of major combat systems has been characterized by a number of high-profi
2、le program cancellations, such as Crusader, an artillery system cancelled in 2002 after having spent $2.2 billion; Comanche, a helicopter program cancelled in 2004 after having spent $7.9 billion; and the Future Combat System (FCS), cancelled in 2009 after having spent $18.1 billion. In addition to
3、the expenditure of resources, these cancellations have impeded the development of newer, more capable systems, permitting potential adversaries to achieve battlefield parity and, in some cases, superiority over U.S. ground combat systems. The Army describes the issue as follows: The Armys current re
4、quirements and capabilities development practices take too long. On average, the Army takes from 3 to 5 years to approve requirements and another 10 years to design, build, and test new weapon systems. The Army is losing near-peer competitive advantage in many areas: we are outranged, outgunned, and
升级VIP 