[20181219]LSB10233_酒吧会费还是不?强制收费和第一修正案.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27765 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-03-21 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:644.59KB
下载 相关 举报
[20181219]LSB10233_酒吧会费还是不?强制收费和第一修正案.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20181219]LSB10233_酒吧会费还是不?强制收费和第一修正案.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20181219]LSB10233_酒吧会费还是不?强制收费和第一修正案.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20181219]LSB10233_酒吧会费还是不?强制收费和第一修正案.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Bar Dues or Bar Dont? Compelled Fees and the First Amendment December 19, 2018 Do mandatory dues imposed by compulsory professional associations violate the First Amendments Free Speech Clause? The Suprem

2、e Court was recently presented with this question in Fleck v. Wetch, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Eighth Circuit). The Eighth Circuit ruled against an attorney who argued that the State Bar Association of North Dakotas mandatory membership fees operate in

3、 violation of the First Amendment. But on December 3, 2018, the Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuits decision and remanded the case to that court “for further consideration in light of” last terms decision in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AF

4、SCME). Janus held that states and public-sector unions may not “extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees.” This Sidebar briefly explains the legal issues implicated by Fleckincluding why compulsory bar dues may be more constitutionally suspect post-Janusand looks forward to other cases that

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告