[20181217]LSB10231_分发问题:沃尔克规则豁免引起歧义.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27767 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-03-26 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:612.29KB
下载 相关 举报
[20181217]LSB10231_分发问题:沃尔克规则豁免引起歧义.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20181217]LSB10231_分发问题:沃尔克规则豁免引起歧义.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20181217]LSB10231_分发问题:沃尔克规则豁免引起歧义.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20181217]LSB10231_分发问题:沃尔克规则豁免引起歧义.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20181217]LSB10231_分发问题:沃尔克规则豁免引起歧义.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Distribution Problems: Volcker Rule Exemption Raises Ambiguity December 17, 2018 According to a recent report, some large banks are contemplating a legal challenge to a regulation commonly referred to as

2、the Volcker Rule, which (subject to certain exceptions) prohibits federally insured banks from (1) engaging in proprietary trading, and (2) owning or sponsoring hedge funds and private equity funds. Specifically, according to Yahoo! Finance, certain large banks are evaluating whether a provision in

3、the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (P.L. 115-174) that some commentators have interpreted as exempting only small banks from the Volcker Rule in fact exempts a considerable number of large banks as well. The competing interpretations of this provision (Section 203) co

4、uld have significant implications for the future of the Volcker Rule, as Yahoo! Finance estimates that only the six largest U.S. banks would remain subject to the Rule under a broad reading of the exemption. This Sidebar discusses the Volcker Rule and the interpretive issues with Section 203 that a

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告