[20181219]LSB10234_家是栖息地所在地:最高法院根据《濒危物种法》处理关键栖息地问题.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27769 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-03-21 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:630.75KB
下载 相关 举报
[20181219]LSB10234_家是栖息地所在地:最高法院根据《濒危物种法》处理关键栖息地问题.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20181219]LSB10234_家是栖息地所在地:最高法院根据《濒危物种法》处理关键栖息地问题.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20181219]LSB10234_家是栖息地所在地:最高法院根据《濒危物种法》处理关键栖息地问题.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20181219]LSB10234_家是栖息地所在地:最高法院根据《濒危物种法》处理关键栖息地问题.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Home is Where the Habitat is: Supreme Court Addresses Critical Habitat under the Endangered Species Act December 19, 2018 On November 27, 2018, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that only “h

2、abitat” of an endangered species can be designated as “critical habitat” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). (Justice Kavanaugh did not participate in the decision.) The case, Weyerhauser Co. v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, involved the Fish and Wildlife Services (FWSs or Services) decisions

3、(1) to designate a 1,544-acre private property as critical habitat for the endangered dusky gopher frog, and (2) not to exclude the property from its critical habitat designation. The Court remanded the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit) to determine whether the

4、private property was “habitat” for the frog and if the FWS abused its discretion when it decided not to exclude the property from the critical habitat designation. Although the Supreme Court did not define “habitat” under the ESA, its ruling is significant because it clarifies that, in order to be d

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告