[20190220]LSB10196_超额罚款从根本上来说是否不公平?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27922 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-04 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:586.42KB
下载 相关 举报
[20190220]LSB10196_超额罚款从根本上来说是否不公平?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20190220]LSB10196_超额罚款从根本上来说是否不公平?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20190220]LSB10196_超额罚款从根本上来说是否不公平?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20190220]LSB10196_超额罚款从根本上来说是否不公平?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Are Excessive Fines Fundamentally Unfair? Updated February 20, 2019 UPDATE 2/20/2019: Today, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Timbs v. Indiana that the Eighth Amendments Excessive Fines Clause is incorporated in

2、the Due Process Clause of the Fourth Amendment and is therefore binding on the States. The original post from September 12, 2018, follows below. The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider the question of whether it is constitutionally unfair for a state to impose an excessive fine. More precisely

3、, it granted certiorari in Timbs v. Indiana to consider whether the Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, which applies to the states, incorporates the Eighth Amendments Excessive Fines Clause. The standard for incorporation is whether the protection in question “is fundamental to our scheme of

4、ordered liberty.” The Indiana Supreme Court believed that only the U.S. Supreme Court may answer that question. And so, the Indiana court reversed a lower court determination that the Excessive Fines Clause precludes the states confiscation of a drug dealers Land Rover. The facts are undisputed. Tys

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告