[20190409]LSB10201_法院是否具有发布大陪审团秘密材料的固有权力?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28100 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-10 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:601.18KB
下载 相关 举报
[20190409]LSB10201_法院是否具有发布大陪审团秘密材料的固有权力?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20190409]LSB10201_法院是否具有发布大陪审团秘密材料的固有权力?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20190409]LSB10201_法院是否具有发布大陪审团秘密材料的固有权力?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20190409]LSB10201_法院是否具有发布大陪审团秘密材料的固有权力?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Do Courts Have Inherent Authority to Release Secret Grand Jury Materials? Updated April 9, 2019 UPDATE 4/9/2019: On April 5, 2019, the three-judge panel in McKeever ruled that federal courts lack “inheren

2、t authority” to authorize the disclosure of grand jury matters in circumstances not covered by an explicit exception set out in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It thus appears that, for the time being, the panels decision has closed off one potential avenue for Congress to obta

3、in grand jury material in federal court in the District of Columbia (though the decision could always be reheard en banc or overturned by the Supreme Court). That said, as the McKeever decision notes, Congress previously was successful in obtaining grand jury materials pursuant to the Rule 6(e) exce

4、ption for disclosure “preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding” on the theory that an authorized impeachment inquiry is preliminary to such a proceeding. That avenue appears to remain available to Congress after McKeever. Furthermore, Congress has in the past taken the position t

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告