[20190508]LSB10296_ATF的库存禁令是否符合APA?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28186 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-05-08 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:767.77KB
下载 相关 举报
[20190508]LSB10296_ATF的库存禁令是否符合APA?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20190508]LSB10296_ATF的库存禁令是否符合APA?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20190508]LSB10296_ATF的库存禁令是否符合APA?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20190508]LSB10296_ATF的库存禁令是否符合APA?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20190508]LSB10296_ATF的库存禁令是否符合APA?.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Does ATFs Bump-Stock Ban Comport with the APA? May 8, 2019 Congressional interest in regulating “bump stock” devices grew after authorities discovered that the perpetrator of the October 2017 mass shootin

2、g in Las Vegas had attached to his semiautomatic firearms an accessory that allowed his rifles to effectively mimic the firing capabilities of a fully automatic weapon (e.g., a machine gun). But to date, federal legislation has not been enacted that expressly regulates bump stocks. At the administra

3、tive level, though, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) banned these deviceseffective March 26, 2019in a final rule published in the Federal Register 90 days earlier on December 26, 2018. ATF achieved this ban by classifying bump-stock devices as “machineguns,” as that ter

4、m is defined in the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) and the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA). Several bump-stock owners and advocates challenged ATFs rule in multiple lawsuits, arguing, among other things, that ATF promulgated the rule in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). In one

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告