[20190703]LSB10322_基索诉威尔基:最高法院支持奥尔主义但澄清了其局限性.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28351 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-07-03 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:627.19KB
下载 相关 举报
[20190703]LSB10322_基索诉威尔基:最高法院支持奥尔主义但澄清了其局限性.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20190703]LSB10322_基索诉威尔基:最高法院支持奥尔主义但澄清了其局限性.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20190703]LSB10322_基索诉威尔基:最高法院支持奥尔主义但澄清了其局限性.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20190703]LSB10322_基索诉威尔基:最高法院支持奥尔主义但澄清了其局限性.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Kisor v. Wilkie: Supreme Court Upholds the Auer Doctrine but Clarifies Its Limitations July 3, 2019 On June 26, 2019, the Supreme Court decided Kisor v. Wilkie, declining the petitioners request to overtu

2、rn one of the most significant and contentious doctrines in administrative law. That doctrine, commonly called the Auer or Seminole Rock doctrine, generally instructs courts to defer to agencies reasonable construction of ambiguous regulatory language. While the Court in Kisor declined to dispatch t

3、his deferential rule, it emphasized limitations to the doctrines scope and application that may bear consequences for future courts review of agency action and, perhaps, the manner in which agencies go about the decision-making process. This Sidebar provides an overview of the Kisor decision. The Su

4、preme Court has established several doctrines to guide judicial review of agency action. Perhaps the most well known is the Chevron doctrine, which generally instructs courts to defer to an agencys reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute it administers. Auer deference takes its name from t

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告