[20190717]LSB10128_高等法院驳回了暴力罪定义的规定认为其在宪法上含糊不清.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28372 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-07-27 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:693.83KB
下载 相关 举报
[20190717]LSB10128_高等法院驳回了暴力罪定义的规定认为其在宪法上含糊不清.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20190717]LSB10128_高等法院驳回了暴力罪定义的规定认为其在宪法上含糊不清.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20190717]LSB10128_高等法院驳回了暴力罪定义的规定认为其在宪法上含糊不清.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20190717]LSB10128_高等法院驳回了暴力罪定义的规定认为其在宪法上含糊不清.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20190717]LSB10128_高等法院驳回了暴力罪定义的规定认为其在宪法上含糊不清.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i High Court Strikes Down Provision of Crime of Violence Definition as Unconstitutionally Vague Updated July 17, 2019 UPDATE: In June 2019, following the publication of this Sidebar, the Supreme Court in Un

2、ited States v. Davis held that the residual clause of the “crime of violence” definition found in 18 U.S.C. 924(c) is unconstitutionally vague. 18 U.S.C. 924(c) imposes enhanced prison sentences on criminal defendants who use a firearm during the commission of a “crime of violence,” and employs a de

3、finition of a “crime of violence” that is virtually identical to the one found in 18 U.S.C. 16. Citing Johnson v. United States and Sessions v. Dimaya, the Court ruled that the second prong of 18 U.S.C. 924(c)s definition, which covers a felony “that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that p

4、hysical force against the person or property of another may be used,” provides no reliable way to determine whether a criminal offense ordinarily carries a substantial risk of force. The government, which acknowledged that 18 U.S.C. 924(c)s second prong was unconstitutionally vague in light of Johns

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告